The Supply Management jobsite

Whose job is it anyway?

12 August 2010 |

It emerged yesterday that the UK government has been paying for the services of a firm of American lobbyists to drum up business for UK suppliers of defence equipment.

This organisation apparently holds sway within the US government and it has been argued that its influence could have knock-on benefits to buyers of defence equipment in the UK. A Ministry of Defence (MoD) official said the lobbyists not only helped generate work for UK vendors, but their specialist knowledge and influence was helping the MoD to purchase higher quality defence equipment at lower costs for the British armed forces.

That’s all well and good, but I thought the MoD passed this responsibility – promoting the export potential of UK defence manufacturers – to the UKTI Defence & Security Organisation back in 2008. So why are we paying someone else to do it?

UK taxpayers footing the bill for an additional contract to this seemingly “secretive” US firm got me thinking – exactly who should be responsible for trade and procurement? Is the benefit of helping UK buyers source and negotiate better contracts really justification for this kind of deal?

2 Responses to “Whose job is it anyway?”

  1. It should not matter who does the job. It is far more important that the job is done and done well. Hiring Americans to sell to America sounds like a good idea to me. With the Anti-British sentiments stirred up by the BP Deepwater Horizon fiasco I would expect better results from agents who can get closer, physically and culturally, to the ultimate decision maker. Let’s measure the results and try not to be jingoistic about initial outlay.

  2. Selling is challenging, especially in international markets. If we have to sell instruments of death (do we?), the more people involved in making the sales pitch, the better.

Leave a Reply

Notify me on comments